Red-team a senior-marketing piece for age steering
Rung 8 of 10 · Red-team audit
1 · Learn the move · Red-team audit
Age is a protected class, so marketing copy aimed at older buyers is a Fair Housing minefield. 'great for retirees,' 'active seniors,' 'empty nesters' all steer by age and familial status. A red-team audit turns AI loose on your own piece to hunt those phrases before a fair-housing tester does: it quotes the line, strikes it, explains the liability, and rewrites to the property's accessibility FEATURES stated as facts. It never endorses or softens the steering. The one legitimate exception is a genuine age-restricted community: if the property is in a HOPA-qualified 55+ community, that fact may be stated, but the eligibility rules defer to the community and the buyer's attorney; the audit still strikes any 'for seniors' framing on a non-restricted home.
Red-team this senior-marketing piece for Fair Housing. Quote-and-strike every age-steering phrase ('great for retirees / active seniors / empty nesters'), explain the liability, and rewrite to accessibility FEATURES as facts. If a genuine 55+ HOPA community is involved, state only that and defer eligibility to the community/attorney. Never endorse the steering.2 · Your turn. You write the prompt
Your teammate drafted a flyer to reuse: "Great for retirees and active seniors! This low-maintenance ranch is perfect for empty nesters ready to slow down. Located in Sunny Pines, a 55+ community." The property facts you can confirm: single-level ranch, no-step entry, main-floor primary and laundry. Sunny Pines is indeed an age-restricted community, but you haven't verified its specific eligibility rules. Write a prompt that red-teams the flyer and rewrites it cleanly.
Remember: the AI sees only your prompt, not this page. If the situation isn't in your prompt, it doesn't exist.
Optional. These shape the output when you run your prompt below, not your score.